Raw Milk Debate is Finally Reaching the Mainstream.

The enzymes in foods are very delicate, so delicate that they are actually destroyed by the proceses of pasteurization. Foods that lack the benefits of enzymes steal enzymes from the body and cause it to work much harder during the digestion processes.

In addition to destroying the nutritional benefits of food, Pasteurization creates harmful proteins that can harm the body, and irradiation modifies the foods, sometimes creating toxic byproducts.

Now that people are finally beginning to understand that you can’t just zap all of your foods with heat and radiation, they are taking an interest in more natural ways of obtaining nutrients. Hopefully the ridiculous regulations requiring pasteurization are repealed and consumers are allowed to make their own choices.

Mainstream Raw Milk Articles: Washington Post | New York Times

The demand for raw, unpasteurized milk is booming. According to Sally Fallon, president for the Weston A. Price Foundation, the number of raw milk drinkers is now at about half a million people across the United States — many of them willingly breaking the law, purchasing their milk from “underground black markets,” and other creative setups.

Twenty years ago, the Food and Drug Administration banned interstate sales of unpasteurized milk, but individual states determine how raw milk is allowed to be bought and sold within their borders. The sale of raw milk for human consumption is illegal in 15 states, whereas 26 allow it with restrictions. Only a handful of states, including Washington and California, allow it to be sold in stores.

Gregory Miller, vice president of the National Dairy Council, claims drinking raw milk is like playing Russian roulette, asking, “Why would you take that risk?”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture tested raw milk from 861 farms in 21 states in July 2007. Their report came back claiming nearly a quarter of the samples contained illness-causing bacteria, including five percent with listeria, three percent with salmonella, and four percent with less dangerous types of E. coli.

Raw-milk proponents claim it contains more nutritional value, and more antibodies and healthful enzymes than pasteurized milk. “What proponents of raw milk call ‘life forces,’ we call bacteria,” says Ted Elkin, deputy director of Maryland’s Office of Food Protection and Consumer Health Services.

But Sally Fallon points out that tainted dairy is only a problem when the milk comes from typical conventional dairy facilities. “That milk could pose a danger,” she says, “But milk from cows fed on pastures actually has [it’s] own antimicrobial components that keep it safe.”

Similar Posts:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *